Preparation and In vitro
Characterisation Venlafaxine HCl Controlled Release Tablets
Dr. Y. Krishna Reddy*, K. Giri
Department of Pharmaceutics,
Nalanda College of Pharmacy, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University,
Hyderabad, Telangana.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: rajinisuralabs1@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
The aim of the present study
was to develop Controlled release formulation of Venlafaxine HCL to
maintain constant therapeutic levels of the drug for over 12 hrs. Eudragit S
100, HPMC K4 M and HPMC K15 M were employed as polymers. All the formulations
were prepared by direct compression method. The blend of all the formulations
showed good flow properties such as angle of repose, bulk density, tapped
density. The prepared tablets were shown good post compression parameters and
they passed all the quality control evaluation parameters as per I.P limits.
Whereas from the dissolution studies it was evident that the formulation (F5)
showed better and desired drug release pattern i.e., 98.46 % in 12 hours. It
contains the synthetic polymer HPMC K4 M as controlled release material. It
followed zero order release kinetics mechanism.
KEYWORDS: Venlafaxine HCL,
Eudragit S 100, HPMC K4 M, K15 M, Controlled release tablets.
INTRODUCTION:
Controlled release dosage form
is a dosage form that release one or more drugs continuously in predetermined
pattern for a fixed period of time, either systemically or locally to specified
target organ. Greater attention is paid on development of oral controlled
release drug delivery systems due to flexibility in designing of dosage form.
The main challenges to oral drug delivery systems are to deliver a drug at
therapeutically effective rate to desirable site, modulation of GI transit time
and minimization of first pass elimination. Control release dosage form
provides better maintenance of optimal and effective drug level for prolonged
duration with less dosing frequency and side effects1,2. Venlafaxine
HCL is an antidepressant of the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake
inhibitor (SNRI) class.
This means it increases the
concentrations of the neurotransmitters serotonin and norepinephrine in the
body and the brain. Venlafaxine is used primarily for the treatment of
depression, general anxiety disorder, social phobia, panic disorder, and
vasomotor symptoms3-8.
The objective of the study
includes to improve the bioavailability, Reduce the number of doses and to
increase patient compliance it was formulated as controlled release tablets
using various polymers9-10.
Materials:
Venlafaxine HCL gift sample
provided by Sura Labs, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad. Eudragit S 100, HPMC K4 M, HPMC
K15, PVP K30, Talc, Magnesium Stearate, MCC pH102 purchased from Merck
Specialities Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, India.
Methods:
Preformulation
parameters:
It was evaluated for Bulk
density, True density, Angle of repose, Compressibility index, Hausner ratio.
Formulation
development of Tablets:
All the
formulations were prepared by direct compression.
Table
No:1 Formulation composition for tablets
|
INGREDIENTS |
FORMULATION CODE |
||||||||||||
|
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
F7 |
F8 |
F9 |
F10 |
F11 |
F12 |
|
|
|
Venlafaxine HCL |
37.5 |
37.5 |
37.5 |
37.5 |
37.5 |
37.5 |
37.5 |
37.5 |
37.5 |
37.5 |
37.5 |
37.5 |
|
|
Eudragit S 100 |
10 |
20 |
30 |
40 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
HPMC K4 M |
- |
- |
- |
- |
10 |
20 |
30 |
40 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
HPMC K15 M |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
10 |
20 |
30 |
40 |
|
|
PVP K30 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
Magnesium stearate |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
Talc |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
MCC |
139.5 |
129.5 |
119.5 |
109.5 |
139.5 |
129.5 |
119.5 |
109.5 |
139.5 |
129.5 |
119.5 |
109.5 |
|
|
Total weight |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
|
All the quantities
were in mg
Evaluation of post
compression parameters for prepared Tablets:
The designed
formulation tablets were studied for their physicochemical properties like
weight variation, hardness, thickness, friability and drug content.
In vitro drug release
studies:
900ml 0f 0.1 HCL was placed in
vessel and the USP apparatus –II (Paddle Method) was assembled. The medium was
allowed to equilibrate to temp of 37°C+ 0.5°C. Tablet was placed in the
vessel and apparatus was operated for 2 hours and then the media 0.1 N HCL was
removed and pH 6.8 phosphate buffer was added process was continued from upto
12 hrs at 50rpm. At definite time intervals withdrawn 5ml of sample, filtered
and again 5ml media was replaced. Suitable dilutions were done with media
analyzed by spectrophotometrically.
Application of
Release Rate Kinetics to Dissolution Data:
To analyze the
mechanism of the drug release rate kinetics, the obtained data were fitted into
zero-order, first order, Higuchi and Korsmeyer-Peppas release model.
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION:
Table No:2
Preformulation parameters of powder blend
|
Formulations |
Bulk Density(gm/cm2) |
Tap Density (gm/cm2) |
Carr’s Index (%) |
Hausner ratio |
Angle of Repose (Ɵ) |
|
F1 |
0.55±0.001 |
0.62±0.005 |
11.29±0.10 |
1.13±0.011 |
23.31±0.14 |
|
F2 |
0.57±0.003 |
0.64±0.003 |
10.94±0.07 |
1.12±0.007 |
29.39±0.20 |
|
F3 |
0.59±0.004 |
0.69±0.004 |
11.94±0.09 |
1.14±0.011 |
27.55±0.13 |
|
F4 |
0.61±0.004 |
0.72±0.005 |
15.28±0.28 |
1.18±0.010 |
25.45±0.13 |
|
F5 |
0.52±0.003 |
0.58±0.002 |
10.34±0.09 |
1.12±0.009 |
29.56±0.24 |
|
F6 |
0.46±0.002 |
0.53±0.002 |
13.21±0.11 |
1.15±0.011 |
28.15±0.22 |
|
F7 |
0.57±0.004 |
0.63±0.003 |
9.52±0.050 |
1.11±0.010 |
29.56±0.23 |
|
F8 |
0.60±0.006 |
0.65±0.005 |
10.45±0.08 |
1.12±0.010 |
28.45±0.07 |
|
F9 |
0.47±0.003 |
0.52±0.002 |
14.55±0.12 |
1.17±0.007 |
25.45±0.16 |
|
F10 |
0.51±0.003 |
0.59±0.004 |
13.56±0.09 |
1.16±0.010 |
27.78±0.26 |
|
F11 |
0.63±0.004 |
0.70±0.001 |
12.50±0.10 |
1.14±0.008 |
26.67±0.23 |
|
F12 |
0.55±0.002 |
0.64±0.004 |
14.06±0.11 |
1.16±0.009 |
25.25±0.13 |
Quality Control
Parameters For tablets:
Table No:3 In
vitro quality control parameters for tablets
|
Formulation |
Average weight(mg) |
Hardness (kg/cm2) |
Thickness (mm) |
Friability (%) |
Assay (%) |
|
F1 |
198.2 |
5.3 |
3.15 |
0.14 |
98.15 |
|
F2 |
195.6 |
5.6 |
3.62 |
0.36 |
97.62 |
|
F3 |
199.1 |
5.9 |
3.85 |
0.58 |
99.31 |
|
F4 |
197.4 |
5.0 |
3.19 |
0.18 |
95.28 |
|
F5 |
198.5 |
5.9 |
3.75 |
0.62 |
98.35 |
|
F6 |
199.6 |
5.2 |
3.82 |
0.22 |
97.15 |
|
F7 |
195.3 |
5.8 |
3.31 |
0.15 |
99.75 |
|
F8 |
199.0 |
5.4 |
3.54 |
0.51 |
98.64 |
|
F9 |
198.9 |
5.1 |
3.81 |
0.49 |
99.11 |
|
F10 |
199.5 |
5.2 |
3.14 |
0.17 |
96.18 |
|
F11 |
200.0 |
5.7 |
3.25 |
0.52 |
99.59 |
|
F12 |
197.7 |
5.4 |
3.86 |
0.31 |
98.81 |
In Vitro Drug Release
Studies:
Table No:4 In vitro
dissolution data
|
Time (Hrs) |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
F7 |
F8 |
F9 |
F10 |
F11 |
F12 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0.5 |
8.74 |
9.53 |
6.27 |
8.17 |
7.25 |
12.92 |
18.31 |
19.66 |
14.92 |
17.23 |
13.45 |
17.25 |
|
1 |
16.97 |
15.21 |
14.32 |
11.74 |
12.16 |
25.27 |
23.14 |
25.98 |
27.74 |
22.35 |
25.72 |
26.34 |
|
2 |
29.95 |
28.76 |
26.47 |
26.72 |
18.91 |
35.32 |
28.55 |
36.57 |
36.42 |
31.79 |
35.95 |
34.27 |
|
3 |
37.62 |
39.53 |
36.13 |
32.29 |
22.94 |
42.71 |
35.94 |
45.74 |
43.3 |
36.92 |
43.17 |
43.59 |
|
4 |
45.87 |
46.44 |
48.27 |
39.31 |
28.48 |
56.19 |
38.39 |
51.82 |
54.12 |
47.36 |
51.43 |
52.04 |
|
5 |
52.75 |
57.96 |
59.51 |
48.94 |
36.12 |
62.83 |
41.67 |
64.73 |
59.63 |
56.82 |
55.16 |
57.6 |
|
6 |
60.32 |
62.78 |
72.97 |
53.83 |
44.82 |
67.84 |
45.32 |
69.57 |
66.36 |
62.72 |
59.14 |
64.82 |
|
7 |
73.74 |
74.31 |
77.02 |
59.65 |
60.57 |
72.27 |
48.12 |
76.43 |
71.93 |
67.19 |
65.42 |
68.44 |
|
8 |
87.48 |
79.63 |
84.44 |
66.98 |
67.28 |
75.42 |
52.75 |
81.67 |
78.63 |
73.86 |
67.99 |
71.89 |
|
9 |
96.64 |
82.41 |
89.53 |
74.23 |
75.91 |
79.39 |
67.18 |
94.81 |
86.36 |
77.96 |
73.21 |
78.38 |
|
10 |
98.21 |
92.62 |
97.12 |
81.47 |
78.61 |
82.22 |
72.69 |
98.01 |
91.73 |
83.61 |
76.92 |
82.49 |
|
11 |
96.11 |
87.93 |
87.63 |
95.76 |
87.19 |
95.11 |
88.73 |
81.71 |
97.31 |
|||
|
12 |
92.02 |
98.46 |
92.14 |
96.13 |
92.75 |
86.49 |
|
Fig No:1 Dissolution profile of
All formulations prepared with HPMC K 100, Locust Bean gum and Karaya gum as
polymer’s
From the above results it was
evident that the formulation F5 is best formulation with desired drug release
pattern extended up to 12 hours.
Application of
Release Rate Kinetics to Dissolution Data:
Table No:5 Release
kinetics data for optimised formulation
|
Cumulative (%) release Q |
Time (T) |
Root (T) |
Log |
Log (T) |
Log (%) remain |
Release rate (cumulative % release / t) |
1/Cum% release |
Peppas log Q/100 |
% Drug Remaining |
Q01/3 |
Qt1/3 |
Q01/3-Qt1/3 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
2.000 |
|
|
|
100 |
4.642 |
4.642 |
0.000 |
|
7.25 |
0.5 |
0.707 |
0.860 |
-0.301 |
1.967 |
14.500 |
0.1379 |
-1.140 |
92.75 |
4.642 |
4.527 |
0.115 |
|
12.16 |
1 |
1.000 |
1.085 |
0.000 |
1.944 |
12.160 |
0.0822 |
-0.915 |
87.84 |
4.642 |
4.445 |
0.196 |
|
18.91 |
2 |
1.414 |
1.277 |
0.301 |
1.909 |
9.455 |
0.0529 |
-0.723 |
81.09 |
4.642 |
4.328 |
0.313 |
|
22.94 |
3 |
1.732 |
1.361 |
0.477 |
1.887 |
7.647 |
0.0436 |
-0.639 |
77.06 |
4.642 |
4.255 |
0.386 |
|
28.48 |
4 |
2.000 |
1.455 |
0.602 |
1.854 |
7.120 |
0.0351 |
-0.545 |
71.52 |
4.642 |
4.151 |
0.491 |
|
36.12 |
5 |
2.236 |
1.558 |
0.699 |
1.805 |
7.224 |
0.0277 |
-0.442 |
63.88 |
4.642 |
3.997 |
0.644 |
|
44.82 |
6 |
2.449 |
1.651 |
0.778 |
1.742 |
7.470 |
0.0223 |
-0.349 |
55.18 |
4.642 |
3.807 |
0.834 |
|
60.57 |
7 |
2.646 |
1.782 |
0.845 |
1.596 |
8.653 |
0.0165 |
-0.218 |
39.43 |
4.642 |
3.404 |
1.238 |
|
67.28 |
8 |
2.828 |
1.828 |
0.903 |
1.515 |
8.410 |
0.0149 |
-0.172 |
32.72 |
4.642 |
3.198 |
1.443 |
|
75.91 |
9 |
3.000 |
1.880 |
0.954 |
1.382 |
8.434 |
0.0132 |
-0.120 |
24.09 |
4.642 |
2.888 |
1.753 |
|
78.61 |
10 |
3.162 |
1.895 |
1.000 |
1.330 |
7.861 |
0.0127 |
-0.105 |
21.39 |
4.642 |
2.776 |
1.866 |
|
87.63 |
11 |
3.317 |
1.943 |
1.041 |
1.092 |
7.966 |
0.0114 |
-0.057 |
12.37 |
4.642 |
2.313 |
2.329 |
|
98.46 |
12 |
3.464 |
1.993 |
1.079 |
0.188 |
8.205 |
0.0102 |
-0.007 |
1.54 |
4.642 |
1.155 |
3.487 |
Fig No: 2 Zero order
release kinetics graph
Fig No: 3 Higuchi
release kinetics graph
Fig No: 4 Kars mayer peppas
graph
Fig No: 5 First order release
kinetics graph
From the above graphs it was
evident that the formulation F5 was followed Zero order release mechanism.
АCKNOWLEDGEMENT:
Thе authors arе
thankful to Sura Labs, Dilshukhnagar, Hyderabad for providing thе
nеcеssary facilitiеs, Materials for thе
rеsеarch work.
REFERENCES:
1.
Brahmankar
DM, Jaiswal SB. Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics: Pharmacokinetics. 2nd
ed. Vallabh Prakashan, Delhi: 2009; 399-401.
2.
John C,
Morten C, The Science of Dosage Form Design, Aulton: Modified release peroral
dosage forms. 2nd ed. Churchill Livingstone. 2002; 290-300.
3.
https://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB00285
4.
https://www.drugbank.ca/salts/DBSALT000186
5.
Aukunuru
Jithan, oral drug delivery technology, Pharma book syndicate, 2007, Oral
Formulation 165 - 166.
6.
Campbell
J. A., Eino Nelson, and Chapman DG, Sustained Release Medication. Canad m.a.j.
July 1(81), 1959, 15-16.
7.
Lachman
L, Liberman HA. The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy. 3rd ed., Varghese
Publishing House, Bombay: 293-330.
8.
Remington.
The Science and Practice of Pharmacy. 21st ed, Vol. 1; 2005: 889-905.
9.
B.
Senthilnathan and Anusha Rupenagunta. Formulation development and evaluation of
Venlafaxine hydrochloride orodispersible tablets. International Journal of
Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2011; Vol. 2(4): 913-921.
10. Dusane AR, Gaikwad
PD, Bankar VH and Pawar SP. A review on: sustained released technology. Int J
Res Ayu Pharm, 2011;2(6): 1701-1708.
Received on 26.02.2020
Modified on 20.03.2020
Accepted on 11.04.2020 ©Asian Pharma Press All Right Reserved
Asian J. Pharm.
Tech. 2020; 10(2):81-84.
DOI: 10.5958/2231-5713.2020.00015.X